APHC010186122004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16821/2004 Between: 1. V. SUBRAMANYAM, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT., S/O. V. SIDDAIAH R/O. KVB PURAM VILLAGE, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE APTRANSCO AND 2 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS JOINT MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUTSOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, AP TRANSCO, SPDCL, NELLORE. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, AP TRANSCO, SPDCL, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a writ, direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering my case for appointment to the post of village electrical worker/helper or in any suitable post in the respondent corporation as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Art. 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and also violation of principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents to consider my case for appointment to the post of village electrical worker/helper or any other suitable post in the respondent corporation in the interest of justice and pass . IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 22003 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's case for appoint for the post of village electrical worker/hjelper or in any suitable post in the respondent corporation, pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 33098 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the JMD/APTRANSCO as Respondent No.1 from the WP No. 16821/2004 in the interest of justice and equity and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 25404 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the JMD/APTRANSCO as Respondents No.1 from the WP No. 16821/2004 in the interest of justice and equity and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. P R BALARAMI REDDY 3. P LAKSHMA REDDY 4. P R BALARAMI REDDY(SC FOR AP TRANSCO) The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Bonu Rama Shankar Rao, learned counsel representing Sri A.Chandraiah Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22nd September, 2025 RKS