[2025:RJ-JP:48660] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10594/2025 Ashish Chaturvedi S/o Shri Naresh Chandra Chaturvedi, A-22, Arjunlal Sethi Colony, Jaipur (Rajasthan), Through His Power Of Attorney Shri Anil Meena S/o Shambhu Dayal Meena Aged 40 Years, R/o - T- 13, Felicity Tower, 3rd Floor, Sahkar Marg, Lal Kothi, Po-Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur-302015. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Director (Primary Education), Rajasthan, Bikaner (Rajasthan). 2. District Education Officer (Primary Education), Office of District Education Officer (Primary Education), Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Principal, Government Upper Primary School, Sethi Colony, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 4. Chandradutt Sharma, R/o B-4, Sethi Colony, Agra Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 5. Jitendra Mehta, (Deceased During Suti). 5/1. Sarla Mehta, W/o Late Shri Jitendra Mehta, R/o B-27, Sethi Colony, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 5/2 Arpit Mehta, S/o Late Shri Jitendra Mehta, R/o B-27, Sethi Colony, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 5/3 Amit Mehta, S/o Late Shri Jitendra Mehta, R/o B-27, Sethi Colony, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 5/4 Apporva Mehta D/o Late Shri Jitendra Mehta, R/o B-27, Sethi Colony, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhay Nath Deora on behalf of Mr. Harshad Kapoor For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Order 01/12/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:48660] (2 of 2) [CW-10594/2025] 1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 10.03.2025, whereby not only the plaintiff’s evidence was closed, but the cross-examination of the plaintiff by the defendant was also closed on account of non-appearance of the plaintiff witness. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that an opportunity may be granted to him, to enable him to make himself available for cross-examination. 3. Heard. 4. This Court finds that the suit for simplicitor injunction was filed in the year 2009 and the issues in the suit were framed on 06.11.2009. After almost 16 years of framing of the issues, the plaintiff has not led any evidence. 5. This Court also finds that such conduct of the plaintiff disentitles him from any leniency being shown in his favour. 6. Considering the same, the present Civil Writ Petition is dismissed. 7. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/12