Parimisetty Sri Ravikanth, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/9481/2025 · 2025-06-30
Nyapathy Vijay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46333 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46333 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010182172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 9481 OF 2025 Between: Parimisetty Sri Ravikanth, S/o.Radha Krishna Murthy aged about 45 years Occ: Auditor, R/o.D.No.4-15-119, Bharathpet, 8'*^ Lane, Amaravathi Road Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary - Municipal Administration and Urban Development Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Mission for Elimination of Poverty in Municipal Areas MEPMA, Beside D-Mart Building, Service Road, Kunchanapalli, Guntur, Guntur District, Rep by its Mission Director. 3. The Mission Director, The Mission for Elimination of Poverty in Municipal Areas (MEPMA), Tadepalli, Guntur, Guntur District. 4. M/s. CPSK and Associates, D.No. 29-14-104, Lakshmivarapupeta, Devi Chowk, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory. 5. M/s. Venkata Srinivas and Co, D.No. 69-20-01/1A, 1®* Floor, Triveni Nilayam, Bhaskar Nagar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory. ...Respondents
9 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or diraction,^ declaring the action of the 3 respondent in issuing Circular in Roc..I^^'6i/MEPMA/201 9-20/Community appointing the respondents 4 and 5 to conduct financial audit for two years as illegal, arbitrary, without Auditors dated 01.04.2025 jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions contemplated under Sec.27(2) of AP Mutually Aided Cooperative Societies Act, 1995 and set aside the. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned Circular in Roc.No.01/MEPMA/2019-20/Community Auditors, dated 01.04.2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI B. V. ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : SRI Y. KANAKALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : Mrs.
SODUM ANVESHA Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order:
APHC010182172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 9481/2025 Between: Parimisetty Sri Ravikanth ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.B VANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.SODUM ANVESHA 2.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following:
w THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE WRIT PETITION NO: 9481 nf onofi NYAPATHY VIJAY
ORDER:
1. This Writ Petition is fiied by the petitioner, under Articie Constitution of india seeking Mandamus, 226 of the for the following relief: orZ TdIrscZn. de^^ingThTatmTof°lha ^^ZZTd T’ Jurisdiction and contrary tn, 'Hegai, arbitrary, without Sec.27(2) of AP Mutuaiiv AidaH contemplated under
2. At the time of hearing, learned Standing counsel for the respondent No.2 has submitted that the respondent Nos.4 & 5 have addressed letters on 19.04.2025, auditing of Self- seeking for withdrawal from the contract agreement executed for Help Groups (SHG's), and the letters addressed by the respondent Nos.4 & 5 were as well as the consequential passed on to the Court and respondent No.2, withdrawing from the proceedings issued by the contract were also enclosed.
3. In that view of the dismissed, as infructuous. There applications, if any, shall stand closed. matter, no cause survives and the Writ Petition iIS shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending Sd/-B.PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //true copy// To, section officer One CC to Sri B. V. Anjaneyulu, Advocate [OPUCJ
2. One CC to Mrs. Sodum Anvesha, Advocate [OPUCJ 4 One CC to Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati, Advocate [OPUCJ . One CC to Sri Kanaka Lingeswara Rao, Advocate [OPUCJ A^h P Development, ndhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT]
6. Two CD Copies Cnr High Court of
I HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 9481 OF 2025 IT 2 7 OCT 2025 in isCiirrent Sectionx^^ .C9 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS