V R ENGINEERING & COMPANY, v. M/s. RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED,
WP/35880/2014 · 2025-09-22
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46332 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46332 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010576532014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35880/2014 Between:
1. V R ENGINEERING & COMPANY,, D.NO.23-21-11/2, SEETHARAM NAGAR, B.C.ROAD, NEW GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 026, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI G. V. RAMANA, S/O.VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND
1. M/S RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM - 350 031, REP.BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, (WORKS CONTRACTS), M/S.RASTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLAINT, VISAKHAPATNAM - 031. 3. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER WORKS CONTRACTS, CONVENOR - CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION COMMITTEE, M/S.RASTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLAINT, VISAKHAPATNAM - 031. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, terminating my registration for category 6.1F by proceedings Ref.No. VSP/WC/REGN-
2 JS,J W.P.No.35880/2014
G/2014/1335 dated 01-11-2014 without any notice as arbitrary, illegal and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to continue my registration certificate Ref.No.VSP/WC/REGN- G/12- 13/010-g dated 12-03-2013 registration for category 6.1F to enable me to participate in the future tenders including tenders already participated and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 44899 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders of the rd respondent in proceedings Ref.No. VSP/WC/REGN-G/2014/1335 dated 01-11-2014 by directing the 2nd respondent not to finalize the tenders in respect of Tender Notice No. V S P/EC/Traffic/74240-0/SOT/2014 dated 19-04-2014 pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass . Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Y VIVEKANANDA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A S C BOSE
2. V RAVINDER RAO
3 JS,J W.P.No.35880/2014
The Court made the following ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner. On the earlier occasions also i.e., on 30.08.2025, 08.09.2025 and 16.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.09.2025 KAS
4 JS,J W.P.No.35880/2014
570 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 35880/2014
Date: 23.09.2025 KAS
5 JS,J W.P.No.35880/2014