Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46328 (AP)

GNANIKETAN EM AIDED HIGH SCHOOL, VISHAKAPATNAM & 3 OTHERS v. PRL. SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION, VELAGAPUDI & 3 OTHERS

WP/33679/2017 · 2025-12-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010526872017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 33679/2017 Between: 1. GNANIKETAN EM AIDED HIGH SCHOOL, VISHAKAPATNAM & 3 OTHERS, VISHAKAPATNAM VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SMT P SUNITHA KUMARI 2. GNANIKETAN EM AIDED PRIMARY SCHOOL LALITHA NAGAR,, VISHAKAPATNAM VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SMT P SUNITHA KUMARI 3. GNANIKETAN TM AIDED HIGH SCHOOL LALITHA NAGAR,, VISHAKAPATNAM VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SMT P SUNITHA KUMARI 4. GNANIKETAN TM AIDED PRIMARY SCHOOL LALITHA NAGAR,, VISHAKAPATNAM VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SMT P SUNITHA KUMARI ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PRL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION VELAGAPUDI 3 OTHERS, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, 2 ANDHRA PRADESH, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VISHAKAPATNAM, VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT., A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the rd Respondent, Commissioner of School Education, Andhra Pradesh in not communicating the lifting of the Ban by the Government vide Memo in No. 18836/SE.PS/A1/2012 dated 04-01-2017 and enabling the filling up of the vacant posts in Aided institutions and on the other hand issuing executive instructions contrary to the Statutory Rules and confining the permission to fill up the posts to the Schools that are parties to Writ Petition No. 9503/2005 and batch; as being arbitrary, illegal, subversive of Rule of Law and consequently direct the Respondents 3 & 4 to forthwith process the proposals of the Management dated 22-7-2017 as per the procedure contemplated in Go Ms. No: 1 dated 01.01.1994; and issue such other Writ or Order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 41913 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to forthwith process the proposals of the Petitioner management dated 22-07-2017 for filling up of 8 vacant Aided post in Petitioner School and accord permission in terms of the provisions under GO. Ms. No. 1, dated 01.01.1994, pending Writ Petition the interest of Justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim direction granted in WPMP No. 41913 of 2017 in WP No. 33679 of 2017 of 2017 dated 10.10.2017 3 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. G. Kusuma Papa, learned counsel representing Sri Vijay Mathukumilli, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.12.2025 PNS