-1- 2025:CGHC:9361 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4796 of 2019 1 - Radheshyam Kaivart S/o Late Shri Ramji Kenwat Aged About 45 Years Caste- Kenwat, R/o Bandhawapara Sarkanda, Police Station- Sarkanda,tahsil- Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Patturam Sahu Aged About 46 Years R/o Bandhawapara Sarkanda, Police Station- Sarkanda, Tahsil- Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Additional Tahsildar Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Maya Shriwas President of Shiv Shakti Mahila Samiti, R/o Bandhawapara Sarkanda, Police Station- Sarkanda, Tahsil-Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattistarh. 3 - Durga Rajak W/o Shri Dhanau Secretary of Shiv Shakti Mahila Samiti, R/o Bandhawapara Sarkanda, Police Station- Sarkanda, Tahsil- Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Mukesh Dubey S/o Shri Ashok Dubey R/o Bandhawapara Sarkanda, Police Station- Sarkanda, Tahsil- Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattistgarh. 5 - Samaru Vastrakar R/o Bandhawapara Sarkanda, Police Station- Sarkanda, Tahsil- Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Utras Pandey @ Utkarsh Pandey S/o Shri Kesar Pandey R/o Bandhawapara Sarkanda, Police Station- Sarkanda, Tahsil-Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- For Petitioner : Mr. Vikram Pillai, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Rishi Rahul Soni, Advocate For State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24.02.2025 1) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1. The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner for its kind perusal; 10.2. The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a suitable writ, order or direction commanding the respondent No.1 i.e. the Additional Tehsildar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur to dispose of /decide the case No.101/B-121/2018-19 expeditiously within a period of one month or within any other suitable period. 10.3. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 2) Mr. Vikram Pillai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that a Revenue Case No. 101/B-121/2018-19 is pending before the respondent No.1 i.e. Additional Tehsildar, Bilaspur and same has not been decided yet, therefore, this petition has been filed seeking a direction to the said authority to dispose of the said revenue case. He would contend that a direction may be issued to the said authority to decide the revenue case expeditiously, if already not decided. 3) On the other hand, Mr. Lav Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the -3- State would oppose the submission made by Mr. Pillai. 4) Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Pillai, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Tehsildar, Bilaspur to decide the Revenue Case No. 101/B-121/2018-19, expeditiously, if already not decided. 5) With the aforesaid observation and direction, this petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim