Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46323 (KAR)

SRI. LIAQUAT A PATHAN v. STATE BY KARNATAKA

CRL.P/10855/2022 · 2025-02-25

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8362 CRL.P No. 10855 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10855 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI. LIAQUAT A PATHAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE AZIZ KHAN OCCU: ADVOCATE R/O. NO.302, SPLENDOR APARTMENT, NO.505, 3RD BLOCK, 4TH MAIN, 1ST STAGE, HBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 043 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.K. METRI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE BY KARNATAKA BHARATINAGAR POLICE STATION SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 2. SRI. SYED IBRAHIM S/O. LATE ABDUL SATTAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.39, HAINES ROAD, BHARTINAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VENKAT SATHYANARAYAN, HCGP FOR R1) Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8362 CRL.P No. 10855 of 2022 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENTS IN C.C.NO.50166/2021 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.265/2016 BHARTINAGAR P.S. PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 11TH A.C.M.M BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323, 448, 504, 506, 34 OF IPC. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. There is no representation. 2. The order sheet dated 10.01.2025 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent and there is no representation. Petition is of the year 2022. Process fee for issuance of notice to respondents along with a copy of the petition, annexures and documents are not furnished. Finally list this petition after four weeks. Interim order granted earlier is extended till the next date of hearing." - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8362 CRL.P No. 10855 of 2022 3. In spite of that, process fee for issuance of notice to respondent No.2 is not paid. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6