SEEMA W/O ROSHANLAL D/O BHORILAL v. ROSHANLAL S/O SHRI PACHURAM
CMA/1430/2021 · 2025-12-02
Inderjeet Singh, Ravi Chirania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46314 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46314 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49009-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1439/2021 Seema Gurjar W/o Roshanlal D/o Bhorilal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nagwas, Badiyal Khurd, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa. ----Appellant Versus Roshanlal S/o Shri Pachuram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Center Ka Gola, Liloj Ka Gola, Tehsile Baswa, District Dausa. ----Respondent Connected With D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1430/2021 Seema W/o Roshanlal D/o Bhorilal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Nagwas Tehsile Baswa, District Dausa. ----Appellant Versus Roshanlal S/o Shri Pachuram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Liloj Ka Gola, Tehsile Baswa, District Dausa. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mohit Gupta. For Respondent(s) : None.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 02/12/2025 Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant–wife submits that both parties have jointly filed an application under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the learned Family Court and the learned Family Court has allowed the said application vide order dated 24.09.2025.
[2025:RJ-JP:49009-DB] (2 of 2) [CMA-1439/2021] A certified copy of the order dated 24.09.2025 is taken on record. In view of the above development, counsel for the appellant– wife submits that, by efflux of time, both the appeals have become infructuous. Accordingly, both the appeals are disposed of as having become infructuous.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/192-193