[2025:RJ-JP:43765] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14086/2025 Rohit S/o Kamlesh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Lodipura, Police Station Mantown, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In J/c, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 31/10/2025 1. The second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Rohit S/o Kamlesh seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.168/2025 dated 17.05.2025 registered at P.S. Bonli District - Sawaimadhopur, for the offence under Sections 305(a) and 331(4) of BNS. The first bail application of petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn on 14.08.2025 and now charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:43765] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14086/2025] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that after filing of charge-sheet, two witnesses were examined which includes PW-1 Raghunandan, but he has not named present petitioner as a person, who committed theft and was seen in CCTV footage. He further submitted that after filing of charge-sheet this Hon’ble Court has granted bail to Sanjeev Kumar and Gajendra. He further submitted that the case of present petitioner is in parity with Gajendra. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He further submitted that petitioner is having a criminal background. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. After dismissal of first bail application as withdrawn on 14.08.2025, police has filed a charge-sheet and two witnesses PW-1 Raghunandan and PW-2 Buddhi Prakash were examined by the prosecution. This Court has granted bail to Sanjeev and Gajendra on 15.10.2025 and 17.10.2025 respectively. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case [2025:RJ-JP:43765] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14086/2025] and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Rohit S/o Kamlesh, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /27