Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46307 (RAJ)

DINESH SINGH S/O SHRI BHAGWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/11483/2025 · 2025-10-15

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42151] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11483/2025 Dinesh Singh S/o Shri Bhagwat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village And Post Jatnagla, Tehsil Hindauncity District Karauli, (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General And Director Coordinator, Home Defence Headquarter, Rajasthan Jaipur. 3. The Commandant, Office Of Home Guard Training Centre, Jawahar Nagar, Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/10/2025 1. Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner and learned AGC. 3. Instant Writ Petition is preferred with following prayer:- (a) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature the respondents may direct to quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 12.04.2021 (Annexure-2) and 03.06.2025 (Annexure-7); (b) The respondents may directed to renew the service of the petitioner on the post of volunteer as Home Guard for further years in the interest of justice; 4. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon Annexure-I submits that petitioner has undergone training of [2025:RJ-JP:42151] (2 of 2) [CW-11483/2025] Home Guards and thereafter he was enrolled as volunteer in Home Guards, Division, Karauli but his services were terminated on 12.04.2021. He further submits that all four criminal cases registered against present petitioner were disposed of and petitioner was acquitted from all the charges and there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner. He further submits that he has moved an application for re-evaluation and taking petitioner back as Home Guard in District Karauli but same was turned down by the Commandant on 03.06.2025 and he preferred an appeal but same has not been decided by the DG, Home Guards. 5. Having considered the submissions and considering the documents as placed on record, the instant writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the appeal with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from the submission of copy of this order, but after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. After deciding the appeal a copy of decision be communicated to the petitioner either by the way of speed post or by e-mail, if same is provided by the petitioner. The petitioner has a right to re-approach the Court, if he is aggrieved of the decision of respondent No.2. 7. With aforesaid, the writ petition with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /187-S