Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46304 (PNJ)

POOJA SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/3711/2025 · 2025-04-15

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-3711 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (107) Pooja Singh and another State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN 1. Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents No. 3 to 5 2. counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition as he wishes to pursue his representation accordance with law. 3. withdrawn, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. 3711-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Pooja Singh and another Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Neeraj Sansaniwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Puru Jarewal, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of private respondents No. 3 to 5. After arguing vehemently on the merits of the cas counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition as he wishes to pursue his representation before the competent authority accordance with law. In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as wn, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3711-2025 Date of Decision:- 15.04.2025 ……Petitioners ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Advocate Mr. Puru Jarewal, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition as he before the competent authority in In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as wn, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. 2025 15.04.2025 s s the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at e, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition as he in In light of the above, the present petition stands dismissed as PARUL 2025.04.15 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRWP-3711 4. order/direction passed in this petition shall not be an petitioners, in case, they are found invol respondent- law. 15.04.2025 Parul 3711-2025 2 It is made clear that filing or pendency of this petition or any order/direction passed in this petition shall not be an petitioners, in case, they are found involved in any illegal activity and the Authorities shall take appropriate action, in accordance with Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:- It is made clear that filing or pendency of this petition or any order/direction passed in this petition shall not be an alibi or defence to the ved in any illegal activity and the Authorities shall take appropriate action, in accordance with (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No It is made clear that filing or pendency of this petition or any or defence to the ved in any illegal activity and the Authorities shall take appropriate action, in accordance with PARUL 2025.04.15 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document