GALVANO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. WEST CENTRAL RAILWAY
ARBAP/21/2025 · 2025-11-28
Bipin Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46297 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46297 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48535] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Arbitration Application No. 21/2025 Galvano India Private Limited, Having Registered Office At E, 95- 97, Upsidc, Surajpur Industrial Area, Distt. Gautambudh Nagar Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201306 Through Its Aurhorized Representative Mr. Ashutosh Srivastava, Resident Of 1503, Towert-3, Mcc Signature Heights, Raj Nagar Extension, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh-201017. ----Petitioner Versus West Central Railway, Through Cpm-2, Kota Division Having Registered Address At Cpm-Gsu, Kota, West Central Railway Railway Colony, Railway Station Area, Kota, Rajasthan 324002. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nishita Gambhir Mr. Jatin Sehgal Mr. Sourabh Thathera For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh Yadav, CGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Order 28/11/2025
1. The present application has been filed for appointment of Arbitrator, in terms of arbitration clause under the agreement between the parties.
2. The arbitration clause is reproduced as under:-
“64.(3)(b):Appointment of Arbitrator where applicability of Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act has not been waived off.”
3. Both the parties are in the agreement that claimant has not waived off his right as provided under section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and therefore, the Arbitrator may be appointed.
[2025:RJ-JP:48535] (2 of 2) [ARBAP-21/2025]
4. Considering the above submissions, the present arbitration application is allowed. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq (Retd. Chief Justice), resident of R/0-7, Bhagat Vatika, Civil Lines, Jaipur, is appointed as sole Arbitrator, to decide the dispute between the parties.
5. The arbitrator shall be paid fee in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the Act, as amended. The fee of the arbitrator will be equally borne by both the parties.
6. The Arbitrator is requested to complete the proceedings as per time limit specified under Section 29A of the Act.
7. With the above observations, the present Arbitration Application stands disposed of.
8. All pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
9. Copy of this order be sent to the appointed Arbitrator.
(BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/118