Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:86977 Court No. - 38 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 39024 of 2015 Petitioner :- Satyandra Tiwari And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Tiwari,Shravan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Hari Kunwar Asthana Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J. 1. This wit petition is filed for the following reliefs:- "I. To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certioraris to quash the order on 30.4.2015 passed by the respondent no. 4. II. To issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the salary of the petitioners month to month and also direct the respondents to pay the vases salary of the petitioners since the date of appointment on 24.7.2007 till to day." 2. The seventh respondent institution was admitted into grant in aid by U.P. Government Order No. 730 on 15.09.2005 and having vacancy of five posts of Assistant Teachers the respondent no. 7 has sought permission from the respondent no. 6 to process the said post vide his letter dated 09.05.2006 and again on 21.12.2006 the committee has made a request to respondent no. 4 and on the permission being granted by the competent authority, the said posts were notified on 06.02.2007 in a daily newspaper and accordingly the selection committee has been constituted and the petitioners were selected and appointment orders were issued on 12.03.2007. On 07.05.2007 the Deputy director of Sanskrit Mahavidhyalay U.P. has approved the said appointments. 3. Despite approval, the respondents have not released the salaries to the petitioners. The petitioners have approached this Hon'ble Court vide Writ Petition no. 52779 of 2014 and the same was disposed of vide its order dated 26.09.2014 directing the fourth respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners and to pass appropriate orders. Consequent to the said directions, the respondent has passed the following impugned order on 30.04.2015 rejecting the claim of the petitioners on the following grounds:- " वरर 1995 सस वरर 2010 तक शशककक कक शनययशक कस समबनध मम ककई सपष वयवसथथ न हकनस कस कथरण शनययकककयक बनद रहह। इस अवधध मम यथचहगण कक शनययशक कस समबनध मम शनदसशथलयथ सतर सस अनयमकदन शदयस जथनस कथ पश हह नहह उठतथ। वरर 2007 मम शनययशक हकनस कस उपरथनत वरर 2014 तक यथचहगणक दथरथ वसतन कक मथमग न करनथ पथम दषयथ यथचहगणक कक शनययशक शवधधमथनय हकनस एवम शनदसशथलय कस उक पतक कस आधथर पर हकनस मम समदसह पकट करतथ हह। शनदसशथलय कस समबकनधत अनयभथग मम अशगकथमड कस बथद अशभलसख उपलबध नहह हकनस कथ तथय पकथश मम आनस कस बथद हह यथचहगणक दथरथ कक टरशचत पतक कस आधथर पर वसतन भयगतथन कक मथमग कक जथ रहह हह। शनदसशथलय दथरथ इस पकथर तदथर शनययशकयक कक अनयमशत दसनस कस सपष पमथण अनय शकसह सनदभर मम उपलबध नहह हहयस हह। अतत यथचहगपनस कथ रथजककर सस वसतन भयगतथन शदयस जथनस कथ औशचकय नहह हह। एतदथरथ ररट यथ०सम० 52759/2014 सकयसनद शतपथठह व 2 अनय बनथम उ०प० रथजय व 6 अनय मम पथररत मथ० उचच नयथयथलय कस आदसश शदनथमक 26.09.2014 कस समथदर मम यथचहगणक कथ पकयथवसदन शनरसत कर शनसतथररत शकयथ जथतथ हह। भवदहय ह०असपष ( कमलसश कय मथर) उप शशकथ शनदसशक (समसकक त) शशकथ शनदसशथलय, उतर पदसश, इलथहथबथद।" 4. Mr. Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has contended that the rejection is only based on assumptions as the authorities are admitting the appointment of the petitioners and the authorities have admitted the sanction and vacancy of post in seventh respondent institution and also admitted the appointments made in the year 2007 but only on the ground that in a fire accident all the files, pertaining to General (2) Extension Section, were burnt in the year 2008 and no record is available with them pertaining to the appointments as well as approval of the petitioners in the said office and the petitioners approaching the court as well as respondents, claiming the salaries, after 7 years knowing the fact that files were burnt which is only an assumption. As the records are not available with the fourth respondent the respondent can call for the records from seventh respondent or from the fifth respondent but without doing so, they have rejected the claim of the petitioners, which is not in accordance with law. 5. He further submitted that in fact the seventh respondent has followed the procedure contemplated under the rules and he sought permission from the competent authority and as permission was granted by the fourth respondent, the seventh respondent has notified the posts by advertising in a daily newspaper on 06.02.2007 when that is the position the respondent cannot reject the claim of the petitioners only on the ground of non-availability of files in the said office. 6. After getting the notice, the respondents have filed the counter affidavit, however, even in the counter affidavit they have taken the very same stand as the files are not available in the office and no record is forthcoming, with regard appointment as well as approval of the petitioners, hence they rejected the claim of the petitioners for release of the salary. 8. Considering the submissions and upon perusal of the record it is clear that the petitioners have annexed paper notification along with writ petition which is mentioned herein-under:- " शह सरवथर आदशर समसकक त महथशवदथलय ( उतर मथधयशमक) ( शकशकरगमज सलसमपयर, दसवररयथ उतर पदसश अधकधलधखत ररक पदक कक पकशतर कस धलए आवसदन आरशकत शकयस जथतस हह इचछय क अभयधथरयक अपनस अपनस पकररत एवम हसतथकररत आवसदन पत अपनह शहकशणक यकगयतथओम कस पमथण पतक सशहत पबनधक कस पथस पमजहकक त पत वयशकगत रप सस कथयथरलय मम आकर हथथक- हथथ शवजथपन पकथशशत हकनस कस तहन सपथह कस अनदर आवसशदत करम। शवलमब सस पथप आवसदन पतक पर शवचथर नहह शकयथ जथएगथ। 1- वयथकरण 2 पद वयथकरण शवरय सस आचथयर 2- सथशहकय 1 पद सथशहकय शवरय सस आचथयर 3- आधयशनक दक पद समथज शथस शवरय सस सनथतककतर एवम पशशशकत तथथ शहनदह शवरय सस सनथतककतर वसतनमथन एवम सभह अनयमनयदसय भतथ उतर पदसश शथसन दथरथ वतरमथन समय मम पभथवह शनयमक एवम दरक कस अनयसथर दसय हकगस। सथकथककथर शदनथनक 5.03.2007 कक सयबह 11 बजस सस शवदथलय पथमगण मम समपन हकगथ। आयय सहमथ 21 वरर सस 35 वरर तक। नकट- तदथर पर मथनदसय पर कथयररत शशकक कक वरहयतथ हकगह एवम आयय मम पथमच वरर कक छक ट दह जथएगह पबनधक" 9. It clearly shows that they have advertised the said post on 06.02.2007 in Dainik Panch Bhuj newspaper which clearly indicates that seventh respondent has initiated the process and advertised the post and they have also placed the approval granted by the 4th respondent which is reproduced herein-under:- "पसरक शशकथ शनदसशक (मथ0), शशकथ सथमथनय (2) शवसतथर अनयभथग, इलथहथबथद। ससवथ मम, शह सरवथर आदशर समसकक त उतर मथधयशमक शवदथलय शकशकरगमज, सलसमपयर दसवररयथ। पतथमकत सथमथनय (2) शवसतथर अनयभथग / 264-5/2007-08 शदनथमक: 7/5/07 शवरयत शह सरवथर आदशर समसकक त उतर मथधयशमक शवदथलय शकशकरगमज सलसमपयर, दसवररयथ मम ररक पद कस पशत शनययक शह यकगसशर नथथ शतपथरह स०अ० वयथकरण शह सकयसनद शतवथरह स०अ० वयथकरण एवम शहमतह दहनथवतह शतपथठह स०अ० सथशहकय कस अनयमकदन कस समबनध मम। महकदय, उपययरक शवरयक आपकस पत शदनथमक 18.3.2007 दथरथ यह अवगत करथयथ गयथ हह शक शशकथ शनदसशथलय कस पत शदनथमक 27.12.2006 दथरथ दह गयह पकवथरनयमशत कस अनयकम मम दक दहशनक समथचथर पत मम शदनथमक 6.2.2007 कक शवजथपन पकथशशत कर पथप आवसदन पतक कस आधथर पर चयन सशमशत दथरथ सथकथककथर कस उपरथनत गयणथमक सकचह कस आधथर पर वयथकरण शवरय कस दक पदक कस सथपसक शह यकगसशर नथथ शतवथरह व शह सकयसनद शतवथरह तथथ सथशहकय शवरय कस एक पद कस सथपसक शहमतह दहनथवतह शतपथठह कथ चयन शकयथ गयथ। चयन सशमशत दथरथ चयशनत उक अनयथधथरयक कक शनययक शकयस जथनस हसतय पबनध सशमशत नस शदनथमक 9.3.2007 कक बहठक मस सवर सममशत सस पसतथव पथररत कर शह यकगसशर नथथ शतवथरह व शह सकयसनद शतवथरह कक स०अ० वयथकरण कस पदक पर तथथ शहमतह दहनथपतह शतपथठह कक स०अ० सथशहकय कस पद पर तदथर/ असथथयह आधथर पर आयकग कस मथधयम सस शनयशमत शनययशक हकनस तक कस धलए शकयथ गयथ। उक शनययक/ कथयररत अधयथपकक कथ अनयमकदन शथसनथदसश शदनथमक 23.3.1984 और शनदसशथलय कस पत/ पतथमक सथमथनय (2)/ शवसतथर /3186-3276/95-96 शदनथमक 01.11.1995 कस अनयकम मम उनकस दथरथ वथसतशवक कथयरभथर गहण शतधथ सस पदथन शकयथ जथतथ हह। भवदहय, ( शवजय शमकर शमश) उप शशकथ शनदसशक (समसकक त) कक तस- शशकथ शनदसशक उ०प० पकषथमकन सम० सथमथनय (2) शवसतथर अनयभथग / /2006-07 उसह शतधथ कक पशतधलशप- धजलथ शवदथलय शनरहकक, दसवररयथ कक इस शनदरश कस सथथ पसशरत शक वसतन भयगतथन कक कथयरवथहह शनयमथनयसथर समपन करम। उप शशकथ शनदसशक (समसकक त) कक तस- शशकथ शनदसशक उ० प०" 10. On perusal of the both the documents it clearly indicate that the petitioners were appointed after subjecting the regular selection process and the same were also noted by the fourth respondent in his approval order 07.05.2007. 11. In view of the said circumstances, the respondents cannot deny the salaries to the petitioners on the ground that the files are not available. In view of the same, the impugned order dated 30.04.2015 is set aside and the matter is remanded to the authorities to pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order and if required, they can issue notice or call the records from the concerned office, including the seventh respondent, before passing of the orders. It is needless to say that respondent shall release the salaries as well as monetary benefits, in the meantime. 12. With aforesaid observations, this petition finally stands disposed of. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Saurabh (Donadi Ramesh, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad