Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46292 (RAJ)

DILIP S/O SHRI KRISHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13613/2025 · 2025-11-01

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43905] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12753/2025 Sajan Kumar S/o Laxminarayan, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Laxmipura Police Station Ramganj Mandi District Kota Rural. Presently Resident Of Sawaiganj Police Station Ravanjanadoongar District Sawai Madhopur. At Present In District Jail Tonk. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13613/2025 Dilip S/o Shri Krishan, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Gandhi Nagar, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur ( At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh with Mr. Shivam Sharma Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/11/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.65/2025 registered at Police Station-Rawanjana Dungar, District-Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:43905] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-12753/2025] 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He further submitted that there is no documentary evidence filed from which it can be inferred that the so called injury caused to the injured- Vikram is dangerous to life. Petitioners are behind the bars since 18.09.2025 and 20.09.2025 respectively. No custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the cases may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Sajan Kumar S/o Laxminarayan and Dilip S/o Shri Krishan shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the [2025:RJ-JP:43905] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-12753/2025] satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/82-83