HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 10992/2022 1. Haji Ikram Patel Nimdi Wale Son Of Babu Ji, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of House No. 319/4, Masjid Wali Gali, H.r. Colony, Char Darwaja, Jaipur. 2. Haji Gul Mohammed Patel Ghatu Wale Son Of Abdul Karim, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of House No. 03, Hajrat Ali Colony, Aamer Road, Jaipur. 3. Mohammed Nisar Patel Gadh Wale Son Of Babu Kha, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Near Life Academy School, Neelgaro Ka Nala, Chokdi Ramchandra Ji, Jaipur. 4. Haji Noor Mohammed Patel Son Of Munna Ji Dungari Wale, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of House No. 1-A, Pannilal Ji Choki, Suraj Colony, Bas Badanpura Road, Jaipur. 5. Mohammed Aazam Patel Mahar Wale Son Of Haji Ali Bux, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 1-A, Madhavdas Colony, Ramgarh Road, Jaipur. 6. Haji Nizamuddin Patel Khandele Wale Son Of Suleman, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Ikbal Bhai Chakki Wale Ke Upar, Jagannath Shah Ka Rasta, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur. 7. Babu Kha Patel Khandele Wale Son Of Ramjan Kha, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 19, Maniharo Ki Masjid Ki Gali, Choudhary Colony, Gangapol Gate Ke Bahar, Jaipur. 8. Mohammed Salim Kaligar Son Of Abdul Kaligar, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 4/5, Meena Colony, Chhoti Dungari, Bas Badanpura Road, Jaipur. 9. Mohammed Ishaq Patel Madhopur Wale Son Of Rajjak Madhopur, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 3851, Jogiyo Ka Tiba, Kumharo Ki Nadi, Chokdi Ramchanra Ji, Jaipur. 10. Haji Mohammed Patel Uncha Kuva Wale Son Of Subrati, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Ratan Medical Ke Upar, Cid Thane Ke Samne, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur. 11. Subhan Kha Patel Madhopur Wale Son Of Fulji, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Purana Tabela Ki Masjid Ke (2 of 3) [CRLMP-10992/2022] Samne, Jagannath Shah Ka Rasta, Ramganj Bazar, Jaipur. 12. Shekh Mohammed @ Shekhu Ji Patel Hasted Wale Son Of Burhan, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Plot No. A-40, Gurudwara Ke Pas Wali Gali, Madhavdas Colony, Ramgarh Road, Jaipur. 13. Haji Fakeer Mohammed Patel Laxmangarh Wale Son Of Rahman, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 23, Jagdish Colony, Aamer Road, Jaipur. ( Died During The Trial). 14. Ikbal @ Babloo Patel Paproon Wale Son Of Karim, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 65, Regaro Ki Kothi, Nawab Ka Choraha, Ghatgate Bazar, Jaipur. ( Died During Trial). 15. Rajjak @ Babloo Bhai Patel Mundad Wale Son Of Chuttan Kha, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Plot No. C-59, Mohmmadi Masjid Ke Samne, Manbagh, Delhi Bypass Road, Jaipur. 16. Mohammed Jafar Khokhar Patel Son Of Babu,., Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Bal Bhavan Ke Pas Wali Gali, Kalyan Ji Ka Rata, Indra Bazar, Jaipur. 17. Haji Mohammed Aslam Patel Kama Wale Son Of Indu Ji Kama Wale, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Darbar Hotel Ke Piche, Kailashpuri, Aamer Road, Jaipur. 18. Babu Kha Patel Ghatu Wale Son Of Mohammed Ji Ghatu Wale, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 166- K, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 19. Fakir Mohammed Patel Dari Wale Son Of Nijam Ji, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 48, Madhavdas Colony, Krishna Colony Ramgarh Road, Jaipur. 20. Shramjan Patel Segane Wale Son Of Hussain, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Manbagh Hospital Ke Piche, Anandpur, Jaisinghpura Khor, Delhi Bypass Road, Jaipur. 21. Mohammed Shafi Patel Aamlod Wale Son Of Babu, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 17, Islam Colony, Ramgarh Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. (3 of 3) [CRLMP-10992/2022] 2. Mohammed Ramzan Son Of Shri Mohammed Akbar, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Makan No. 3-A, Jagannath Shah Ka Rasta, Chokdi Ramchndra Ji, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/11/2025 1. This petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioners to cure the defect(s). 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter and they have lost interest in pursuing this matter. 3. In view of the above, the instant criminal misc. petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. 4. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/242