1 2025:CGHC:596 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No.8519 of 2024 • Rajesh Kumar Gupta S/o Chunni Lal Gupta Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Tilaipali, Post Raikera, Tahsil Gharghoda, District- Raigarh, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 4. Land Acquisition Officer Cum Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 5. National Thermal Power Company Limited Through Its General Manager, Tilaipali Coal Block Project Office At Lailunga Road, Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6. National Thermal Power Company Limited (Registered Office Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Ntpc Bhawan, Scope Complex, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road New Delhi 110003. 7. The Deputy General Manager (LA - R & R) N.T.P.C. Tilaipali Coal Mining Project, Lailunga Road Gharghoda, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sushobit Singh, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Nupur Trivedi, PL For Respondents No. 5 to 7 : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/01/2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the case. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash/set aside the impugned order dated 18.10.24 passed by respondent no.7. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issued appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus, order, direction directing the respondent to performed their duties under clause 7.1 to 7.6 of the Chhattisgarh Rehabilitation Policy 2007. 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may issue suitable 3 direction to the respondents and the respondents may be directed to consider the claims of the petitioner for the grant of regular permanent employment in the permanent establishment of respondent N.T.P.C. and the respondent N.T.P.C. may be directed to grant employment to the petitioner as per the qualifications and training of the petitioner. 10.5 That, any other relief / reliefs which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be allowed.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner admitted the fact that the instant petition has been registered as service matter whereas the contents are civil in nature, due to misunderstanding he has filed this instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner is seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition at this juncture. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. 5. The Registry is directed to return the relevant copies of the petition to the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat