[2025:RJ-JP:42893] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8715/2025 1. Satish S/o Dhaniram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Gazipur, P.s. Bayana, District Bharatpur. (Raj.). 2. Manish S/o Dhaniram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Gazipur, P.s. Bayana, District Bharatpur. (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9269/2025 1. Tarachand S/o Jagdish, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Gajipur, Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur. 2. Vinod S/o Tarachand, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Gajipur, Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brij Mohan Sharma Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/10/2025 1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR Nos.104/2025 registered at Police Station-Bayana, District- Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 125 of BNS, and FIR No.105/2025 registered at Police Station-Bayana, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections [2025:RJ-JP:42893] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8715/2025] 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS, the petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common facts, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both parties have arrived at a compromise, which is also evident from the perusal of the case diary. Hence, the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioners are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail applications of the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 482 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioners-Satish S/o Dhaniram, Manish S/o Dhaniram, Tarachand S/o Jagdish and Vinod S/o Tarachand, they shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each of them to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; [2025:RJ-JP:42893] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8715/2025] (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/92-93