Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46283 (AP)

DINDI CHANDRA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14540/2024 · 2025-12-02

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010289532024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14540/2024 Between: 1. DINDI CHANDRA RAO, S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O H.NO.5-58, M-KOTHAVALASA VILLAGE, BALARAMPURAM COLONY, JAMI MANDAL, VIZANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BOGHAPURAM POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. DINDI KANAKAM, W/O APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O A- RAYAVALASA VILLAGE, BOGHAPURAM MANDAL, VIZAANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5. BALASA BHUSHANA RAO, S/O KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O A-RAYAVALASA VILLAGE, BOGHAPURAM MANDAL, VIZAANAGARAM DISTRICT. 6. DINDI NARENDRA, S/O APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/O A-RAYAVALASA VILLAGE, BOGHAPURAM MANDAL, VIZAANAGARAM DISTRICT 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not acted upon the complaint dated 01.07.2024 lodged by the petitioner against the respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in accordance with law is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to act upon the complaint dated 01.07.2024 lodged by the petitioner against the respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in accordance with law, by providing police protection to the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2ND respondent to act upon the complaint dated 01.07.2024 lodged by the petitioner against the respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in accordance with law, by providing police protection to the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14540 of 2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: <…to issue a writ, order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not acted upon the complaint dated 01.07.2024 lodged by the petitioner against the respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in accordance with law is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to act upon the complaint dated 01.07.2024 lodged by the petitioner against the respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in accordance with law, by providing police protection to the petitioner and to pass.…= 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the respondent No.3-police have received the petition from the petitioner through respondent No.2 in tappal and as the petitioner failed to appear before the SHO during enquiry, the respondent No.3 registered the said complaint as FIR No.244 of 2024 under Sections 447, 506 r/w 34 of IPC of Bhogapuram Police Station on 14.07.2024 and the case is under investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14540 of 2024 Dated.03.12.2025 UPS 306