f IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV^^Ff\ y< /. r- FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ”4 A V. % \. - ■> PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 791 OF 2025 Between: Battula Venkateswarlu, S/o Chinna Yaliamanda, Aged about 60 years, Business, R/o D.No. 10-6-6, Bank side of Gajjala Brahma Reddy Hospital, Arundelpet, Narasaraopet, Guntur District. ...Petitioner/Appellant/Accused AND 1. The State: Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati. 2. Bude Sambasiva Rao (Complainant), S/o Chenchu Papaiah, aged 53 years. Vegetable Business, R/o 1-4-29/49, Barampet, Narasaraopet Town and Mandal, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash/Modify the order, dated 27-12- 2024 passed in CrI.M.P No. 785 of 2024 in CrI. Appeal No. 244 of 2024 by the learned XIII Additional Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet to extent of on compliance of same conditions as imposed by the trial court while suspending the sentence imposed by it to the satisfaction of learned I ¥ / Additional Civil Judge’s Court (Junior Division), Narasaraopet, on or before 31-12-2024, by extending one week time for compliance the said order. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Venkata Durga Rao Anantha, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following Order: APHC010035562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 791/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Battula Venkateswarlu AND ...RESPONDENT/COI\/IPLAINANT(S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1 .VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR J The Court made the following Order: learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has extension of time for compliance with the The filed the present petition seeking an conditional order imposed in CrI.M.P. No. 785 of 2024 in Crl.A. No. 244 of 2024 on the file of the XIII Additional Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet. 2 The learned Sessions Judge, vide an order dated 27.12.2024, directed the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount on or before 31.12.2024. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as per Section 148(6), the learned 60 days for the deposit of such Judge has directed the four (04) days from the date Sessions Judge sought to grant a time period of compensation. However, the learned Sessions of the compensation within petitioner to deposit 20% of receipt of this order. 3. Considering the shall stand extended by two (02) 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition As a sequel, miscellaneous same, the time granted by the learned more weeks from today. Sessions Judge is allowed. petitions pending, if any, sh^tand closed. ASSIStIm? » RAFI ASSISTANT registrar //true COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER The XIII Additional 2- The I Additional Guntur District. 3. One CC to Sri Venkata 4. TwoCC^ Amaravatl [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies Sessions Judge, Narasaraopet, Civil Judge’s Court Guntur District. (Junior Division), Narasaraopet. Durga Rao Anantha Advocate [OPUCJ ■s ot the Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh at SAM vna T \ ✓ HIGH COURT DATED:28/03/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.791 of 2025 ofan^^ I 03 APR 2025 ^^ Current Section . ^s^S^spatch^S^ «9/ ALLOWING THE CRLP