106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3699-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 22.04.2025 SHARUP AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chetan Sharma, DAG Haryana SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for directing the official respondents no. 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6. Affidavit of Vijay Partap, IPS, Superintendent of Police, Nuh, Haryana, has been filed, which is taken on record. Perusal of the affidavit depicts that statements of petitioners and private respondents No.4 to 6 have been recorded, in which the petitioners stated that now the family members have no objection being their living together and they do not have any kind of threat perception and respondents No.4 to 6 stated that they have no objection in living together of petitioners. In the light of above, this Court is of the firm view that there is no threat perception existing for inviting interference at this stage by the Court. MEENU 2025.04.23 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-3699-2025 -2- Otherwise also, learned State counsel undertakes that necessary speaking order on the representation dated 05.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) would be passed within a period of two days as per the notification No.12/252/2023-4HG-IV dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Home Department, Haryana Government. Hence, the present petition is disposed off, having been rendered infructous. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 22.04.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.04.23 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document