[2025:RJ-JP:47220] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7017/2025 1. Mahesh Chand Gurjar @ Babu Lal Gurjar Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Prithvipura Tehsil Tunga, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Roshan Gurjar Son Of Shri Chote Lal Gurjar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Prithvipura Tehsil Tunga, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Dilkhush Gurjar @ Golu S/o Mahesh Chand Gurjar, Aged About 17 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Father Shri Mahesh Chand Gurjar, R/o Village Prithvipura Tehsil Tunga, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Hemraj Gurjar @ Golu Gurjar Son Of Shri Jairm Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Lawan, Tehsil Lawan, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Dinesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Hari Narayan, R/o Village Aamteda, Dausa, Sadar Dausa, Dausa, Presently Hari Stone Crasher, Mandruppura, Tunga, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Nirmal Kumar Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP Mr.Hardev Puri Goswami JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/11/2025 1. By way of filing these criminal misc. petitions, a prayer has been made for quashing the proceedings arising out of the impugned F.I.R. No.141/2025 registered at the Police Station Tunga, District Jaipur City (East) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), [2025:RJ-JP:47220] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7017/2025] 189(2), 303(2) & 352 of the BNS, 2023 and 3(1)(s), 3(1)(s) & 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. This Court vide order dated 01.11.2025 directed the Investigating Officer to verify the factum of compromise and in pursuance of the aforesaid order, the Investigating Officer has verified the factum of compromise arrived between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and in the case of The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. Learned counsel submits that under these circumstances, the proceedings pending against the petitioners may be quashed. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-complainant is in agreement with the factum of compromise and states that now the complainant has no objection. 5. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on the record. 6. Considering the above verification report so furnished by the concerned SHO Police Station and applying the principles as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke the inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 8. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petitions stand allowed. The proceedings arising out of the impugned F.I.R. [2025:RJ-JP:47220] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7017/2025] No.141/2025 registered at the Police Station Tunga, District Jaipur City (East) against the petitioners stand quashed and set-aside. 9. The stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /61