[2025:RJ-JP:43886] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13443/2025 Dhanraj S/o Shyamlal, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Ramnagar Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar(Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13444/2025 Harishankar S/o Gopal, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Tagar Mohalla Bhawani Mandi Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar(Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13445/2025 Trilokchand S/o Balchand, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Radheyshyam Mandir Ki Gali Bhawani Mandi Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar(Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13836/2025 Sahil Mohammed Alias Shalu S/o Abdul Latif, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Garib Nawaj Colony Bhawani Mandi Police Station Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus [2025:RJ-JP:43886] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13443/2025] State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 01/11/2025 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.398/2025 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar offence under Sections 112(2) BNS-2023. 2. Since all these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in these cases. The allegation against the present petitioners is of organizing illegal gambling in the shops located in different locations. He argued that petitioners are in custody since 01.10.2025, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned [2025:RJ-JP:43886] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13443/2025] counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Dhanraj S/o Shyamlal, Harishankar S/o Gopal, Trilokchand S/o Balchand, and Sahil Mohammed Alias Shalu S/o Abdul Latif, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /142-145