- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48522 WP No. 17381 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 17381 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAJESH B S/O SRI. J. BALARAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO.140, 4TH MAIN, C LAYOUT, BANNIMANTAPA, MYSURU-570 015. 2. SMT. MALASHREE B D/O SRI. J. BALARAJU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/AT NO.140, 4TH MAIN, C LAYOUT, BANNIMANTAPA, MYSURU-570 015. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RUPESH KUMAR S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48522 WP No. 17381 of 2025 2. THE TAHSILDAR, OFFICE OF THE TAHISILDAR MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU-570 005. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, OFFICE AT NO.215, DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS COMPLEX, SIDDARTHNAGAR, MYSURU-570 011. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS,. NAZARBAD MAIN ROAD, OPPOSITE TO TAHSILDAR OFFICE, MYSURU-570 010. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT, URBAN PROPERTY OWNERSHIP RECORDS, OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS. NAZARBAD MAIN ROAD, OPPOSITE TO TAHSILDAR OFFICE, MYSURU-570 010. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DTD 27.10.2023 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-M AND ENDORSEMENT DTD 23.04.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-N ISSUED BY THE R-4 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48522 WP No. 17381 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent nos.1 to 5. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that as against the impugned proceedings, appeal would lie under Section 49 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. 3. In light of the same, it would be appropriate to relegate the petitioner to avail of the appellate remedy as is available in law. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off. All contentions are kept open. The time spent before this court would be taken note of by the authorities in an appropriate manner when the appeal is filed before this court. Office to return the certified copies of the orders if filed, after retaining the photostat copies in the office file. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP