1 2025:CGHC:430 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3523 of 2024 Kaushal Anant S/o Jeevan Lal Anant Aged About 22 Years R/o Village - Khariya, Post - Baijalpur, Police Station - Bodla (Wrongly Mentioned As Bodala In The Impugned Order-Sheet), Tahsil And District - Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Out Post - Sambalpur, Police Station - Nawagarh, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... NOn-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Non-applicant : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 03.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/non-applicant. 2. The present CRMP has been filed by the applicant under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for restoration of MCRCA No.1388 of 2024, which was dismissed by peremptory order. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.01.04 13:19:33 +0530 ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.01.04 13:21:54 +0530 2 3. Perusal of the record would show that on 02.12.2024, this Court had passed an order directing the applicant to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- with the Mediation Centre within a period of one week from the said date i.e. 02.12.2024 as the said amount should be paid to the respondent/complainant/wife on her appearance before the Mediation Centre. It further reflected from the order impugned that if the applicant has failed to deposit the amount within the stipulated time, the ad-interim bail granted to the applicant shall automatically vacated and the bail application should stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has failed to deposit the amount of Rs.50,000/- in the given period of time, as such, his bail application has been dismissed automatically without further reference to the Bench. Hence, this petition. 5. For the reasons mentioned in the CRMP supporting with the application for condonation of non-compliance of the order, the present application is allowed and MCRCA No.1388 of 2024 be restored in its original number. Sd/-- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Anu