[2025:RJ-JP:49277] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18725/2025 Mahendra Mali Son Of Shri Ramsukh Mali, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Village Gundli, Tehsil Arain, District Amer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. The Collector Ajmer, District Ajmer (Raj.) 6. Chief Executive Officer, (Rural Development Cell) Zila Parishad, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saurabh Sharma for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully, prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to call for the entire record relating to this case and after pursuing the same maybe pleased to accept and allow this writ petition, and: 1. By an appropriate writ, order or direction respondents may kindly be directed to treated the services of petitioner through respondent [2025:RJ-JP:49277] (2 of 2) [CW-18725/2025] in place of through placement agency in the larger interest of justice. 2. Any other appropriate order, which may be considered just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. 3. Costs of the petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 26.08.2025 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11737/2024 titled as Rodu Lal & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Rodu Lal (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /81