[2025:RJ-JP:44031] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11829/2025 Surgyan S/o Ram Karan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kacchi Basti Basadi, Bhankrota, P.s. Bhankrota, Jaipur West, Rajasthan. (Accused Presently Confined Under District Jail Tonk, Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 03/11/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.104/2024 registered at Police Station Mehandwas, District Tonk for the offence(s) under Section(s) 382 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:44031] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11829/2025] 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, perused the material available on record the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Surgyan S/o Ram Karan is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the criminal antecedent(s) of the accused- petitioner, it is made clear that if he is found to be involved in offences of a similar nature in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail granted to the accused-petitioner by this Court. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /41