Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7566 CRL.P No. 3415 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3415 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)
BETWEEN:
MR. IRFAN AHMED, S/O MAZAR PASHA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT CHIKKA JONIGARA BEEDI, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT -571438 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE BY SRIRANGAPATNA PS REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560001
2.
MR. SYED MANSOOR, S/O SYED ASGHER, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO. 13, D. P. BLOCK, MARAPPA GARDEN, BENSON TOWN POST, BANGALORE - 560046 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R1 SRI. NISHAD S.K., ADV. FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT IN CR.NO.94/2023, DATED 04.05.2023 REGISTERED BY THE SRIRANGAPATNA POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 341, 504, 323, 506 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) AND JMFC COURT, S.R. PATNA, MANDYA DIST. VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7566 CRL.P No. 3415 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In Crl.P.No.3415/2024, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-
“ a) Quash the FIR and complaint in crime No. 94/2023, dated: 04.05.2023 registered by the Srirangapatna Police Station for the offence punishable under Section 341, 504, 323, 506 r/w section 34 of Indian Penal Code pending on the file of the Addl.Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC Court S.R. Patna Mandya Dist. Vide Annexure- A and B in the interest of justice and equity. b) Pass such order/s direction/s, relief/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the Circumspection in the interest and justice.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the 1st respondent – Police have filed the charge sheet. The said submission is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet, if he is so advised and in accordance with law.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
Srl.