Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46254 (ALL)

SMT. MALTI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA529/1002/2025 · 2025-05-06

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:78535 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1002 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Malti Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No.397 of 2019 (State of U.P. Vs. Bhagirathi and others) arising out of case crime no.327 of 2018 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Phoolpur, District Varanasi, pending in the Court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.4, Varanasi, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is the informant of this case. The case pertains to the year 2019 and is still pending at the stage of disposal of the discharge application and the same is still pending for long, waiting for its disposal. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 5. From the perusal of the order-sheets of the trial court it reflects that the matter is running at the stage of evidence. It is also pertinent to mention here that copies of the order-sheets appended with the application did not reveal anywhere that the said discharge application was heard and decided by the trial court and the matter is running at the stage of evidence. 6. In the circumstances, the trial court is directed to dispose of the discharge application, if any, pending for disposal within a period of two months from today and thereafter if the said application is rejected, the learned trial court shall make all possible endeavours to dispose of the case under reference as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, keeping in view the work load in the said Court, if there is no other legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad