RAJKUMAR JATAV S/O CHIRANJILAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1530/2020 · 2025-05-15
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4625 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4625 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20571] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1530/2020 Rajkumar Jatav S/o Chiranjilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Khareta Road, Kanjoli Ka Pura, Hindaun City, District Karauli, (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Government, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Mission Director, National Health Mission, Tilak Marg, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Director, Ayurveda Department, Rajasthan, Having Its Address At Ashok Marg, Savitri Chauraha, Ajmer, Raj.
4. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar, Karwar, Nagour Road, Jodhpur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishesh Sharma for Mr. YC Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 15/05/2025
1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of petitioner, hence, writ petition has been considered on merits as also perused the material available on record.
2. Petitioner filed instant writ petition way back on 22.01.2020, seeking direction against the respondents to issue an experience certificate so as to claim bonus marks for the purpose of considering his candidature for appointment on the post of
[2025:RJ-JP:20571] (2 of 2) [CW-1530/2020] Ayurveda Compounder, pursuant to Recruitment dated
06.10.2018.
2. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.4, submits that recruitment, pursuant to advertisement in question has already been completed. It appears that with passage of time, the relief prayed has rendered infructuous.
3. Thus, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous with liberty to petitioner to file afresh, in case, any new and subsequent cause of action arises.
4. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/13