Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46243 (KAR)

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER v. SMT. B.V. LAKSHMI

RP/379/2023 · 2025-07-15

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26009 RP No. 379 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REVIEW PETITION NO. 379 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9858/2019 BETWEEN: 1. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, REGIONAL OFFICE GAYATHRIPURMA MYSURU-570019 2. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN (LEGAL), REGIONAL OFFICE GAYATHRIPURMA MYSURU-570019 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. NANDITA D HALDIPUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. B.V. LAKSHMI W/O L. NARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/O NO.193, 27TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, JAYANAGARA 6TH BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 082 2. KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MYSORE URBAN DIVISION, BANNIMANTAPPA, MYSORE-570 015 …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by C HONNUR SAB Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26009 RP No. 379 of 2023 (BY SMT. H.R.RENUKA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2; NOTICE IS SERVED ON RESPONDENT NO.1) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 20.04.2023 PASSED IN W.P NO.9858/2019 AT ANNEXURE - A AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS DISMISSING THE PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this Court does not find any apparent error to entertain the review petition within the limited scope of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. 2. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of the Court to file writ appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge in the writ petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26009 RP No. 379 of 2023 4. Petitioners are at liberty to take such recourse as advised in law. In view of disposal of this petition, I.A. No.2/2023 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE SMA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18