Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46243 (ALL)

M/S INDOMAC THROUGH PROPRIETOR RP MITTAL AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/12109/2025 · 2025-04-22

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:61351-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12109 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Indomac Through Proprietor Rp Mittal And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kant Mishra,Sanjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Anjali Upadhya,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. The petitioners are claiming ten percent developed land in terms of order of the Supreme Court dated 14.05.2015 passed in Civil Appeal No.4506 of 2015 (arising out of SLP No.27948 of 2009) (Savitri Devi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others), reported in 2015 (7) SCC 21. Concededly, the claim of the petitioners has not been considered by respondent no.3 so far. 2. Ms. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel for respondent no.3- Development Authority states that the Authority will take decision within four weeks from today. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation along with true attested copy of the instant order before respondent no.3 and judgment of the Supreme Court on which reliance is being placed. In the event any such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent no.3-Development Authority within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the representation. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 CS/- (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad