NARAYAN PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS,
Cont.(Cvl)/325/2025 · 2025-04-11
Rajesh Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4624 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4624 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:11125 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 325 of 2025
Narayan Pandey, S/o Late Sitanath Pandey, R/o Village-Sakrigali Rampur, PO-Sakrigali, PS-Sahibganj (M), District-Sahibganj
… … Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Mr. Angranath Swarnakar, the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sahibganj
… … Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR -----
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Rama Kant Tiwari, Advocate
For the Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, AC to AAG-III -----
06/11.04.2025 The present contempt petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties alleging wilful violation of the order dated 03.07.2024 passed in W.P.(C) No. 35 of 2022.
2.
Mr. Sahbaj Akhtar, AC to AAG-III appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2, submits that in compliance of the aforesaid
order of this Court, Mutation Appeal Case No. 02/2019-20 has been
disposed of by the said apposite party vide order dated 13.01.2025.
3.
Mr. Rama Kant Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has already filed a writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 616 of 2025 challenging the aforesaid order, which is pending consideration before this Court.
4.
Considering the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the parties, there is no need to further proceed in the contempt petition. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite party no. 2 is hereby dropped.
5.
The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish