Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4624 (HP)

RAMESH SHARMA v. DROPTI CHAUHAN

CRMP/39/2025 · 2025-01-03

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ramesh Sharma vs. Dropti Chauhan Cr. Revision No.666 of 2024 03.01.2025 Present Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Janesh Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP No.39 of 2025 Though, having taken note of the fact that vide order dated 19.12.2024 passed in Cr.MP No.5221 of 2024, this Court had granted two weeks’ time to the applicant/ petitioner to deposit 50% of the compensation amount in terms of order dated 17.10.2024 passed in Cr.MP No.4234 of 2024, there appears to be no justification to grant further time, however having taken note of the fact that the applicant/petitioner has already prepared draft amounting to Rs. 40,000/-, and he is unable to deposit the same in the Court concerned on account of absence of Presiding Judge, this Court deems it fit to grant further time of one week to the applicant/petitioner to comply with order dated 17.10.2024, as detailed hereinabove, failing which, interim protection granted by this Court vide aforesaid order shall come to an end and no further prayer for extension of time shall be considered. Since learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chopal is on leave, learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Theog, who stands assigned duty to conduct Court at Chopal, is directed to pass appropriate order, thereby permitting the applicant/petitioner to deposit the amount in terms of instant order. The application stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge January 03,2025 (shankar)