APHC010358882020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 23874/2020 Between: 1. MANDA RAMULU,, S/O. LATE KOTAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/ O. MULAPADU VILLAGE, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA, MACHILIPATNAM 3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, KRISHNA, VIJAYAWADA 4. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDIGAMA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. MANNEPALLI CHANDRAIAH, S/O. VEERAIAH, AGED 68 YEARS, CULTIVATION R/O. D. NO.9-33/1, BESIDES TTD KALYANA MANDAPAM, NANDIGAMA TOWN 8S MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in allotting the plots in the land measuring of Ac.1.84 cents in R.S. No.57 of Chandapuram Village, 2 BKM,J W.P.NO.23874 OF 2020 Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District under the scheme Navaratnalu- Pedalandariki 11lu pending the title dispute in between the petitioner and others and 5th respondent herein as bad, illegal arbitrary and violative of Art. 14, 21, 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to take any steps for allotment of the plots in the said land pending disposal of the O.S. No.69/2020 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandigama and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to allot any house plots under the scheme "Navaratnalu¬Pedalandariki Illun on the land admeasuring Ac.1.84 cents in R.S. No. 57 of Chandapuram Village, Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 BKM,J W.P.NO.23874 OF 2020 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in allotting the plots in the land measuring of Ac.1.84 cents in R.S. No.57 of Chandapuram Village, Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District, under the scheme Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu pending the title dispute in between the petitioner and others and 5th respondent. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 23.09.2025, submits that the subject land to an extent of Ac.1.84 cents in R.S. No.57 of Chandapuram Village, Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District, was voluntarily acquired from the 5th respondent for distribution of house sites to eligible beneficiaries from among the landless poor people under the Navaratnalu- Pedalandariki Illu program. On physical verification, it is found that the 5th respondent is in possession and enjoyment of the said land as per the registered sale bearing Document No.4244/2019, to an extent of Ac.1-84 cents vide ePPB Khata No.872. The distribution of house-site pattas to the eligible beneficiaries has been completed, and the construction of house-sites is under process in the above said R.S.No.57. 4. The copy of the instructions of the 4th respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. 4 BKM,J W.P.NO.23874 OF 2020 5. In reply, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 5th respondent in O.S.No.69 of 2020 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandigama. 6. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, no further orders can be passed in this Writ petition. 7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is permitted to pursue the above said suit pending before the civil court. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 24.09.2025 LSP 5 BKM,J W.P.NO.23874 OF 2020 238 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 23874/2020 24.09.2025 LSP