APHC010371262007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 79/2007 Between: 1. KOSANA LAKSHMI, W/O VENKATARAMANA HOUSE HOLD DUTIES C/O MARAGADA APALANARASAYYA AVANAM - 531 163 BUKMILL MANDAL, ...APPELLANT AND 1. KOSANA VENKATARAMANA, S/o Papayya R/o Chippada Village Now Posted at 40, Task Force, Trasit Facility, P.B.No.24, Balavad Post, ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 167 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the operation of the decree and judgment dated 28-3-07 in OP.NO. 140 of 2003 on the file fo the Family Court, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the above appeal in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent: 1. T V SRI DEVI The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.79 of 2007 JUDGMENT:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) During the course of hearing of this appeal, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the parties have settled their disputes out of the Court and are living separately. This Court granted sufficient time to the appellant to get proper instructions from their client. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant represents that they could not contact their clients to get any instructions on this aspect. 3. Considering the above factual position, as the learned counsel for the appellant is not in a position to contact their clients and to place proper instructions before this Court and in view of the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent that parties have settled the matter out of the Court and are living separately, in our considered view, no purpose will be served by continuing these proceedings further. 4. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date:24.09.2025 SCS 4 160 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.79 of 2007 Dt.24.09.2025 SCS