Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46228 (RAJ)

RAJ KANWAR WIFE OF LATE SHRI RAM SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18454/2025 · 2025-12-02

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18454/2025 Raj Kanwar Wife Of Late Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Mahajan Mohalla, Post Bhojpura Kalan, Jobner, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Secretary, Panchaytiraj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Chief Engineer (Admn.), Public Health And Engineering Department, Jaipur. 5. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Village Development Officer, Gram Panchayat Babnerwalon Ki Dhani, Panchayat Samiti Jobner, District Jaipur (Raj.) 7. Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Babnerwalon Ki Dhani, Panchayat Samiti Jobner, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 02/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this Writ petition and further be pleased to: - [2025:RJ-JP:49159] (2 of 3) [CW-18454/2025] 1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to given permanent status to service of petitioner and pay the minimum wages to petitioner and also pay the out standing from the salary/remuneration of petitioner year 2017 to till date and send the name of petitioner in list of P.H.E.D the larger interest justice. 2. The non petitioner may be directed to pay the arrears of minimum wages with 18% p.a. interest. 3. Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 24.10.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18689/2017 (Ganesh Paliwal & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, on basis of decision in case of Pradesh Janta Jal Yojna Shramik Union Vs. The State of Rajasthan (SB CWP No. 15098/2012). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of Ganesh Paliwal (supra) and Pradesh Janta Jal Yojna Shramik Union Vs. The State of Rajasthan (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in [2025:RJ-JP:49159] (3 of 3) [CW-18454/2025] light of ratio laid down in cases referred hereinabove but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /44