Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46226 (AP)

ANDANAM YESANNA v. Sri.P.Koteswara Rao, I.A.S.,

CC/261/2022 · 2025-12-01

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DR,J C.C.No.261 of 2022 APHC010041812022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 261/2022 Between: 1. ANDANAM YESANNA, S/O. LATE ANDANAM SHADRAK, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE , R/O.H.NO.28-1060-2B, YESUKRUPA CHURCH, SAI BABA NAGAR,NANDYAL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI P KOTESWARA RAO I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. SRI C HARI PRASAD, REVENUE DIVISIONAL.OFFICER, KURNOOL DIVISION, KURNOOL CITY, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. SRI D VENKATESH NAIK, TAHSILDAR, KURNOOL MANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the Respondents herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful and deliberate, disobedience of the order dated 05-11-2021 in W.P.No. 25671 of 2021, passed by the HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SA'TYANARAYANA MURTHY and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHALLA SIVASANKAR DR,J C.C.No.261 of 2022 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P SUBASH DR,J C.C.No.261 of 2022 The Court made the following ORDER: The orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.25671 of 2021 dated 05.11.2021 reads as below: <In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to dispose of the representations dated nil-02-2019, 02- 07-2019 and nil-10-2020, submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.= 2. In compliance to the above said orders, the respondents have considered and passed orders but not as directed by this Court within the time limit. 3. Considering the same, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to assail the same if aggrieved. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 02.12.2025 Dvs DR,J C.C.No.261 of 2022 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH 301 CONTEMPT CASE No.261 of 2022 Dated: 02.12.2025 Dvs