1 / 4 2025:CGHC:558 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6499 of 2024 1 - Parsuram S/o Beladiha Aged About 59 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 2 - Chitawar Singh S/o Beladiha Aged About 55 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 3 - Itwari Kurre S/o Puniram Aged About 53 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 4 - Shyam Sundar S/o Sahdev Aged About 47 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 5 - Savan Kumar S/o Roshanlal Aged About 44 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 6 - Shyambai W/o Dataram Aged About 68 Years Caste Teli, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 7 - Dinesh Kumar S/o Ramlal Aged About 45 Years Caste Teli, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 8 - Vijay Kumar S/o Ramlal Aged About 49 Years Caste Teli, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 9 - Baleshwar Prasad Sahu S/o Lalaram Aged About 61 Years Caste Teli, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 10 - Sakuntala W/o Ghanshyam Aged About 37 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 11 - Mayaram S/o Khadau Yadav Aged About 76 Years Caste Yadav, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.01.13 18:09:36 +0530 2 / 4 12 - Devilal Yadav S/o Nanki Aged About 79 Years Caste Yadav, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 13 - Parmeshwar S/o Rambharosh Aged About 59 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 14 - Ramkumar S/o Rambharosh Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 15 - Ravikumar S/o Shankarlal Aged About 51 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 16 - Hitesh Kumar S/o Devdas Aged About 37 Years Caste Chandranahu, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 17 - Raghunandan S/o Girdharilal Aged About 51 Years Caste Chandranahu, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 18 - Suresh S/o Tikaram Aged About 43 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 19 - Rajesh Kumar S/o Bhaneshwar Aged About 27 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector District Sakti Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Land Acquisition Officer Malkharauda, District Sakti Chhattisgarh For Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Justice Shri Bibhu Datta Guru 3 / 4 Order on Board 06/01/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of direction to respondent No.2/Collector, Distt. Sakti (CG) to decide pending representation of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are resident of Village Kalmi, Tahsil Malkharouda, Distt. Sakti (CG) and their land has been acquired for the purpose of construction of Jaijaipur-Malkharouda-Gobarbhata road and the same has been constructed under Chhattisgarh State Road Development Project (ADB Project). The land has been acquired under Mutual Consent Rules, 2016, but no compensation/other benefits has been given to the petitioners. He further submits that the petitioners have filed representation before respondent No.2, but the same has not been decided yet, therefore, it is prayed that this petition may be disposed of directing respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners within the period specified by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection in allowing the limited prayer of the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the representation Annexure P-3. 5. In view of foregoing, it is directed that the respondent No.2/Collector, District: Sakti, C.G., shall look into the matter and take appropriate steps within a period of 30 days from the date of 4 / 4 receipt of a copy of this order to demarcate the subject land and on such demarcation, if it is found that the private land of the petitioner has been acquired for the purpose of construction of road, ensure payment of proper compensation to the petitioner, in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Amardeep