APHC010817982015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 25798 OF 2015 Between: 1. . The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its, Special Chief Secretary, Now Principal Secretary Environment. Forets. Science & Technology Department. Secretariat . Ilyderabad. 2. Thc Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,, (I lead of Forest Force) Anclira Pradesh, Aranya Mayan, Hyderabad ...Petitioners AND 1. I P J l3cnarjee Sio Late Joseph aged about 53 years O, P.J. l3cnarjee, Sio. Late. Joseph. aged about 53 years. Occ: Sub- Divisional Forest Officer Manuguru, Palavancha Division. K.hammam District. Rio. Manuguru. 2. R Mallappa 5/0 Sunkappa aged about 57 years, Occ: Divisional Forest Officer (Flying Squad Division) Kurnool, Kurnool District.R/o. Kurnool. Respondents/Applicants 2 & 3 in 0.A.No.8468 of 2011. 3. M Amanevulu Sic Late Onnurappa, aged about 57 years, Occ: I )ivisional Forest Officer (Flying Squad Division) I lyderabad, R/o. I lyderahad. 4. P 13alaswamy Sio Rayappa aged about 50 years, Occ: Divisional Forest Officer, (Logging Division) I3hadhrachalam. Kaharnmarn District. R/o.Khammam. Respondents/Applicants I & 4 in 0"A.N10.8468/2011 5. R Kondala Rao S/o age not known, Occ: Divisional Forest Officer Social Forest Division. Guntur. Guntur District. 6. N Venkataram Narasaiah S/o and age not known, the then Divisional Forest Officer Bellampalli, Adialabad District. 2 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.25798 of 2015 7. U Gov inda Rao S/o and age not known, Occ: Divisional Forest Officer Vitaianagaram. Vizaianattaram District. 8. C G Swamy Das S/o and age not known, Occ: Divisional Forest Officer. (Outer Ring Road), I lyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, I lyderabad. 9. The A P Administrative Tribunal, rep. by its Registrar. Purani I laveli. I lyderabad. .... ( Respondents 3 8 arc foramal parties as no relief is sought against them) ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for the records relating to and connected with order dated 12-06-2014 in O.A.No.8468 of 2011 on the file of the llonble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and to quash or set aside the same by holding as erroneous and contrary to law and illegal and to pass such other order or orders as this lionble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 33495 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders dated 12-06-2014 in OA.No.8468 of 2011 passed by the Hon`ble andhra PRadesh Administrative Tribunal,Hyderabad IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 21856 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioners as party Respondent NOs. 10 to 13 in W.P. No. 25798 of 2015. 3 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.25798 of 2015 IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 94840 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR SERVICES I (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: CH SIDDHARTHA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents:K V SUBBA RAO. The Court made the following order: 4 CMR,J & GTK,J W.P.No.25798 of 2015 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy) When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Services-I, on instructions, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous and nothing is required to be adjudicated in this Writ Petition. Therefore, recording the same, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J ________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J 02nd December, 2025 Tsy