Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4622 (PNJ)

SUNIL KUMAR AND OTHERS v. O.P. SINGH, IPS, DGP, HARYANA AND ANOTHER

COCP/5938/2025 · 2026-02-19

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 116-I Sunil Kum O.P. Sing Headquar CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate B Kumar and petition wa the consi physical/m object shou of 18-25 y today….”. of Shri O.P COCP-5938-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5938 o Date of decision l Kumar and others Versus Singh, IPS, Director General of quarter, Sector 6 Panchkula and an AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. G.S. Gopera, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 14.10.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-28 ar and others vs. State of Haryana ion was disposed of with the observat onsidered opinion that respond al/medical test to ascertain suitabil should not be to find out whether th 25 years. Let the needful be don .”. Compliance Report dated 09. hri O.P. Narwal, IPS, Inspector Gener 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5938 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-19.02.2026 …..Petitioners al of Police, Haryana, Police nd another …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 28684-2025 titled as “Sunil ryana and others”, whereby the servation that “…this Court is of pondent may conduct fresh tability of the petitioners. The er they are as fit as a candidate done within one month from ed 09.2.2026 by way of affidavit General, Haryana Armed Police, VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.19 15.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Madhuban which is an thereof is s Complianc granted to thus, no cau Writ Court with, the p same may b February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-5938-2025 (O & M) huban-respondent No.2 has already b h is annexed on the file. The same of is supplied to learned counsel for th Learned counsel for the resp pliance Report and submits that the ted to the petitioners and necessary c no cause survives in the present petitio Learned counsel for the petiti Court order dated 14.10.2025 (Annex , the present contempt petition has b may be disposed of as such. Ordered accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, uary 19, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 eady been filed in the Registry, same is taken on record. Copy l for the petitioner. e respondent-State refers to the at the appointments have been sary compliance has been made; t petition. petitioner submits that since the Annexure P-1) has been complied has become infructuous and the if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.19 15.50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document