APHC010115432020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6970/2020 Between: 1. GOKULA KRISHNA RICE MILL, S.NO. 1204/1C, JALADANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER N. VENKATESWARULU S/O SEENAIAH AGED 41 YEARS, R/O JALADANKI VILLAGE, KAVALI, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE 1. ANDHRA PRADESH CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, 74 RAGHU GARDENS, VIJAYAWADA RD, CHOWDHARY PET, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN 2. CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, , JALADANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewi pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the working of the petitioner rice mill without consideri representations dated 01 and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to accept IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6970/2020 GOKULA KRISHNA RICE MILL, S.NO. 1204/1C, JALADANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER N. VENKATESWARULU S/O SEENAIAH AGED 41 YEARS, R/O JALADANKI VILLAGE, KAVALI, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND ANDHRA PRADESH CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, 74 RAGHU GARDENS, VIJAYAWADA RD, CHOWDHARY PET, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, , JALADANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT THE JOINT COLLECTOR, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the working of the petitioner rice mill without consideri representations dated 01-02-2020 and 03-03-2020 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to accept IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA GOKULA KRISHNA RICE MILL, S.NO. 1204/1C, JALADANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER N. VENKATESWARULU S/O SEENAIAH AGED 41 YEARS, R/O JALADANKI VILLAGE, KAVALI, SRI POTTI ...PETITIONER ANDHRA PRADESH CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, 74-20-5B, RAGHU GARDENS, VIJAYAWADA RD, CHOWDHARY PET, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, , JALADANKI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE DISTRICT THE JOINT COLLECTOR, SRI POTTI SRIRAMULU NELLORE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the th, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the working of the petitioner rice mill without considering the 2020 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to accept 2 VS,J W.P.No.6970 of 2020 overdues payable by the petitioner and not to interfere with the working of the petitioner mill and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the working with the petitioner mill, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P BADRINATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) 3 VS,J W.P.No.6970 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Mr. G.Rohith, learned counsel representing Mr. P.Badrinath, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 23.09.2025 MDP