Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46216 (AP)

Smt. Battula Raajeswari, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/29996/2021 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010499462021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29996/2021 Between: 1. SMT. BATTULA RAAJESWARI,, W/O RAJAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- SELF SOURCE, R/O SAI SADAN, F-5, 5TH FLOOR, NEAR KOLLA HANUMANTU RAO ARCH, MANGA MOOR ROAD,ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST- 523001. 2. BATTULA RAJAREDDY,, S/O ANJIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O SAI SADAN, F-5, 5TH FLOOR, NEAR KOLLA HANUMANTU RAO ARCH, MANGA MOOR ROAD,ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST- 523001. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT/POLICE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRTICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, AMARAVATHI HEAD OFFICE/QUARTERS, GUNTUR DIST. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE HEAD OFFICE/QUARTERS, PRAKASAM DIST. 4. THE STAATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALUKA POLICE, ONGOLE TOWN, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST. 5. THE STATE MAHILA COMMISSION AP, REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, SMT. VASIREDDY PADMA, D.NO- 4-19-129/1, VIKAS NAGAR 2ND LINE, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DIST. 6. DR HANUMANTHA RAO, SA) NOT KNOWN, C/O MR. YARRAMNENI ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN YEARS, OCC- DOCTOR AS GENERAL INFORMATION, R/O SAI SADAN, F-1, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR KOLLA HANUMANTU RAO ARCH, MANGA MOOR ROAD,ONGOLE,PRAKASAM DIST- 523001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. BALAIAH B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court Made the Following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to pleased Its is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to consider the representation date 30-11-2021 and provide the protection of petitioner family life, the life threat in the hand of respondents no. 4 and 6 along with persons supra, it is violation of principal of natural justice and as illegal, irregular, irrational, and offends Article 14 to 21 of Constitution of India and other statues force in the time being law of the land, in accordance with laws and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Curt May deem fit and proper in the circumstance of the case and the render justice” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the matter was compromised before the Lok Adalat and no further orders are required in this matter. 4. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stands closed. __________________________________________ Dr. VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.09.2025 ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.29996 of 2021 Dt.22.09.2025 Asr