Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46215 (MAD)

SUDHAN KUMAR S v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WP/18573/2025 · 2025-06-04

P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.18573 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.No.18573 of 2025 Sudhan Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, 1st Floor, District Collector Office Street, Muventhar Nagar, Villupuram District. 2. The Tahsildar, Tindivanam Taluk Office, Tindivanam District. 3. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Tindivanam Police Station, Tindivanam – 604 001. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to act under the law for cleaning the plot and demolishing the old building with the police protection in surveying the entire land of survey Nos.247/12, 248/3, 248/16, 248/12, 248/8, 248/2, 248/11, 248/4, 248/9, 248/20 248/1, 248/18, 248/19. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18573 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.V.T.Narendiran For Respondents : Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third respondent to act under the law for cleaning the plot and demolishing the old building with the police protection in surveying the entire land of survey Nos.247/12, 248/3, 248/16, 248/12, 248/8, 248/2, 248/11, 248/4, 248/9, 248/20 248/1, 248/18, 248/19. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials available on record. 3. On a perusal of the representation made by the petitioner before the respondent police and the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it is seen that the dispute between the parties is civil in nature. This Court is not inclined to grant the relief as sought for by the petitioner in this https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18573 of 2025 writ petition. However, the petitioner is at liberty to workout his remedy before competent civil Court. 4. . In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 04.06.2025 mfa Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No To 1. The Superintendent of Police, 1st Floor, District Collector Office Street, Muventhar Nagar, Villupuram District. 2. The Tahsildar, Tindivanam Taluk Office, Tindivanam District. 3. The Inspector of Police, C-1, Tindivanam Police Station, Tindivanam – 604 001. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.18573 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN, J mfa W.P.No.18573 of 2025 04.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis