Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46209 (AP)

Polu Muralikrishna, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/8669/2019 · 2025-08-13

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010198222019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY.THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8669 OF 2019 Between: Polu Muralikrishna, S/o Seshaiah, Agriculture, Reddykottala village, SAKN Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur Dt., AP. The Superintendent of Police, YSR District, Kadapa. The Station House Officer, B.Kodur PS., YSR Kadapa District. Chinthalacheruvu Narayana, S/o Ramaiah, 48 years, cultivation, Reddykottala village, SAKN Mandal, YSR Kadapa District 2. 3. 4. ...Respondents Petition under Article,226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent SHO in registering a case against the petitioner vide Cr. No. 84 of 2019 of B.Kodur PS., YSR District, U/S 3 (1) (r) of the SC and ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, among S. 323 IPC is nothing but abuse of law, and consequently declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the registration of Cr.No. 84 of 2019 of B.Kodur PS., YSR District, so far as S 3 (1) (r) of the SC and ST Prevention of Atrocities Act. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner, in Cr.No. 84 of 2019 of B.Kodur PS., YSR District and direct the 3rd Respondent SHO to follow the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumr Vs. State of Bihar. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M S P KAMARAJU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No.4: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010198222019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT ANIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8669/2019 [3368] Between: SESHAIAH, SAKN S/0 MURALIKRISHNA REDDYKOTTALA VILLAGE 1.POLU AGRICULTURE, MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND PRINCIPAL REP.BY THE STATE OF AP, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT 1.THE QjzpRfrTARY VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DT., AP. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR DISTRICT, 2.THE KADAPA. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, B.KODUR PS., YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4 CHINTHALACHERUVU NARAYANA, S/0 RAMAIAH, 48 REDDYKOTTALA VILLAGE, YEARS, CULTIVATION, SAKN MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the 2 action of the 3rd Respondent SHO in registering a case against the petitioner vide Cr. No. 84 of 2019 of B.Kodur PS., YSR District, U/S 3 (1) (r) of the SC and ST Prevention of Atrocities Act, among S. 323 IPC is nothing but abuse of law, and consequently declare the same as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the registration of Cr.No. 84 of 2019 of B.Kodur PS., YSR District, so far as S 3 (1) (r) of the SC and ST Prevention of Atrocities Act lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner, in Cr.No. 84 of 2019 of B.Kodur PS., YSR District and direct the 3rd Respondent SHO to follow the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumr Vs. State of Bihar Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M S P KAMARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) % " 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 8669 of ?niQ The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 07.08.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader State is in attendance. representing the 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for prosecution. No order as to costs. non- Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT R^QGIStRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. MSP Kamaraju, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to GP For [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies. Home (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh AL HIGH COURT DATED;14/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 8669 OF 2019 DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS