Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46207 (AP)

Palepu Adinarayana Rao @ Adhi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/25381/2025 · 2025-09-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010455352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25381/2025 Between: 1. PALEPU ADINARAYANA RAO @ ADHI,, W/O GANGADHARA RAO,AGE, 30 YEARS, OCC, COOLIE, PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA MANDAL DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AMALAPURAM, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEM DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINDENT OF POLICE, AMALAPURAM, AMALAPURAM DISTRICT. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, MUMMADIVARAM, MUMMADIVARAM MANDAL, AMALAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHASILDAR, MUMMADIVARAM, MUMMADIVARAM MANDAL, DR B R A DISTRICT 6. THE SHO PS, KATRENIKONA, KATRENIKONA MANDAL, AMALAPURAM DISTRICT. 7. DHANDUPROLU RAMA RAJU, S/O CHINNABABU, AGE, 26 YEARS, OCC, FISH BUSSINESS, PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA 2 MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, 8. MALLADI SHANKARAM, S/O PEDDA SWAMY, AGE, 37 YEAS, OCC, FISH BUSSINESS, PALLAM VILLAE,KATRENIKONA MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, 9. MALLADI KRISHNARJUNA, S/O VENKANNA, AGE, 35 YEARS, OCC, FISH BUSSINESS. PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, 10. OIETI SAI, S/O BRAHMESWARA RAO, AGE, 53 YEARS, OCC, FISH BUSSINESS. PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, 11. MALLADI CHIRANJEEVI, S/O VENKANNA, AGE, 30 YEARS, OCC, FISH BUSSINESS. PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, 12. MALLADI SURI BABU, S/O VENKANNA, AGE, 40 YEARS, OCC, FISH BUSSINESS. PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, 13. ANGANI SHANKARAM, S/O KAMA RAJU, AGE, 25 YEARS, OCC, FISH BUSSSINESS. OCC, COOLIE, PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, 14. MALLADI VENKANNA, S/O SATYANANDAM, AGE, 26 YEARS, OCC, FISH BUSSINESS. OCC, COOLIE, PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, 15. MALLADI SATYANANDAM, S/O VENKANNA, AGE, 45 YEARS, OCC, FISH BUSSINESS. PALLAM VILLAE, KATRENIKONA MANDAL, DR B R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action the action of the respondents No 2 to 6, not to take steps in pursuance of the complaint lodged by the petitioners against the unofficial respondents No 7 to 15 dated on 28-07-2025 high 3 headedly, trying to kill me at Pallam village. Katrenikona Mandal, Dr B R Ambedkar Kona Seema District, and State of Andhra Pradesh, and abusing filthy language, and attacked me brutally with deadly weapons along with rods, and sticks, boycott entire family, and they are trying to kill me as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of principle natural justice under article 14, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India. And consequently. direct the respondents to forthwith consider the representation and to provide protection to the petitioner is in negation of the law, and principles of natural justice and fair play, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 5 to take action on the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated on 28-07-2025, by taking necessary steps village banish by the petitioner at Pallam Village, Katrenikona Mandal, Dr B R Ambedkar Konaseem District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 5 to take action on the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated on 28-07-2025, by taking necessary steps village banish by the petitioner at Pallam Village, Katrenikona Mandal, Dr B R Ambedkar Konaseem District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M CHALAPATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25381/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action the action of the respondents No.2 to 6, not to take steps in pursuance of the complaint lodged by the petitioners against the unofficial respondents No.7 to 15 dated on 28.07.2025 high headedly, trying to kill me at Pallam village, Katrenikona Mandal, Dr B R Ambedkar Kona Seema District, and State of Andhra Pradesh and abusing filthy language, and attacked me brutally with deadly weapons along with rods, and sticks, boycott entire family, and they are trying to kill me as being illegal, arbitrary and violation of principle natural justice under article 14, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to forthwith consider the representation and to provide protection to the petitioner is in negation of the law, and principles of natural justice and fair play…= 2. Heard Sri M.Chalapathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent regarding fixation of boundaries. Basing on the complaint given by the 9th respondent herein, a case has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.183 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 109, 191(3) r/w 190 BNS. On the complaint given by the petitioner, a case in Crime No.184 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1) r/w 190 BNS was registered against the unofficial respondents. In both cases, investigation is completed 5 and charge sheets have also been filed. Other cases are also pending between the same parties, i.e., C.C.No.74 of 2023 and C.C.No.1562 of 2023, apart from Crime No.175 of 2023, in which charge sheet is also filed and both parties are bound over under Section 126 BNSS on 17.09.2024. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the petitioner has given another representation in Public Grievance Redressal System to the Collector on 28.07.2025 by making false allegations and matter relates to civil dispute. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse his remedies before appropriate forum. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 JLV 6 48 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25381 of 2025 Dated: 22.09.2025 JLV