RAMNIWAS PALIWAL SON OF SHRI KANARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/11623/2025 · 2025-10-27
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46206 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46206 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43033] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11623/2025 Ramniwas Paliwal Son Of Shri Kanaram, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Ward No.8, Dulhepura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Sikar.
4. The Block Elementary Education Officer, Block Khandela, District Sikar.
5. The Principal, Government Primary School, Charan Ka Bas, Basdi, Block Khandela, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyanka for Mr. Suresh Kumar Dhenwal For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/10/2025
1. Considered application No.1/2025 is allowed for early listing and same is disposed of.
2. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:- (a) The Hon’ble Court may kindly be quashed and set aside the order dated 14.07.2025 passed by respondents;
[2025:RJ-JP:43033] (2 of 2) [CW-11623/2025] (b) Further this Hon’ble Court may kindly be directed to respondents to allow the petitioner on the post of Para teacher (Shiksha Sahyogi) at Government Primary School, Charan Ka Bas, Block Khandela, District Sikar; (c) Further this Hon’ble Court may kindly be granting same relief to the petitioner which has been granted in case of Pokar (supra) as well as Shopat (supra);
3. Considered submission of learned counsel for petitioner.
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /41