CHINTU @ VIKRAM NAGAR AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P.
NABAIL/3185/2025 · 2025-04-24
Vivek Varma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46204 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46204 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:64097 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3185 of 2025 Applicant :- Chintu @ Vikram Nagar And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Vajpeyi,Praveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Dinesh Tiwari, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party, and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 341 of 2024, under Sections 109(1), 333, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 324(2), 61(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190 B.N.S.S., Police Station Sector-20, District Gautam Budh Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants were not named in the first information report and have been falsely implicated in the instant case. As per the medical report dated 16.10.2024 only complaint of pain was recorded. It is next contended that in the alleged incident no person received any injury. No injury report is available on the case diary. The name of the applicant was subsequently disclosed by the informant to the police under Section 161 Cr.P.C. At this stage there is no credible evidence against the applicants. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicants and, in particular, the fact that the applicants were not named in the first information report; the name of the applicants was subsequently disclosed by the informant to the police under Section 161 Cr.P.C.; in the alleged incident no person received any injury; no injury report is available on the case diary; at this stage there is no substantive evidence against the applicants, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 7.
7. In the event of arrest, the applicants- Chintu @ Vikram Nagar, Karan @ Kakkan
Nagar, Billu @ Babli Nagar, Kallu @ Vijay Nagar and Akshay Bansal @ Akchh @ Lackki Bansal be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants. 9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants. 10. The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present
order.
11. The application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 25.4.2025 SKT/- Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad