Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46203 (KAR)

SMT. C. DEEPIKA, v. SRI G RAKESH REDDY,

CP/524/2024 · 2025-01-07

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL PETITION NO. 524 OF 2024 BETWEEN 1 . SMT. C. DEEPIKA, W/O G RAKESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 2 . KUMARI KUSHIKA REDDY D/O G RAKESH REDDY, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT C DEEPIKA, BOTH ARE R/A NO.158, TIGALARA THOTA, JAYANAGARA, NELAMANGALA TOWN, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562123 ...PETITIONER/S [By Sri./Smt : K.N. ARVINDA NAVADA AND SANTHOSH KUMAR, ADVOCATES FOR M/S ELITE LEGAL INC.,] …2 CP NO. 524/2024 2 AND 1 . SRI G RAKESH REDDY, S/O LATE GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 2 . SMT K NAGARATHNAMMA W/O LATE GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 3 . SRI G SANTHOSH S/O LATE GOVINDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, 4 . SMT. ASHWINI W/O SANTHOSH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.1-4 ARE R/A HOUSE NO.224, 5TH CROSS, M S RAMAIAH LAYOUT, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU-560073 5 . SMT. VEENA W/O ANAND REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, …3 CP NO. 524/2024 3 6 . SRI ANAND REDDY S/O HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.5 & 6 ARE R/A 3RD MAIN, HOSAHALLI EXTENSION STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU-560040 7 . SRI HANUMANTHA REDDY S/O LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 8 . SMT. SUJATHA W/O HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.7 & 8 R/A AIMANGALA POST, HIREYURU TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577558 …RESPONDENT/S CP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 24 OF CPC, PRAYING TO, TRANSFER THE CRL.MIS.259/2023, CRL. MIS NO.724/2022 AND CRL. MIS NO.750/2023 PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT CHALLAKERE TO PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NELAMANGALA, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. …4 CP NO. 524/2024 4 This Civil Petition coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order. ORAL ORDER No representation on petitioners' side on call. Objection raised regarding the maintainability of the petition under Section 24 of CPC is not answered yet. However, to accommodate, time for two weeks is granted to make written submission before the Registry regarding the maintainability of the case. In case such written submission is not made within the time granted, the petition be dismissed without further reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 07.01.2025, office objections are not complied with, hence petition be dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : SR R By : CMS C By : CDJ Ty Dt : 11.03.2025 C.Dt : 11.03.2025