Chekuri Akshay @ Munna, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
CRLP/8440/2025 · 2025-08-19
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46203 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 46203 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE iPRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO lA No. 1 OF 2025 t-'Oi- % ft ■0 ---1 1 rff 0 I IN CRLP NO: 8440 OF 2025 Between: Chekuri Akshay @ Munna, S/o. Chekuri Anjani Kumar Varma, Aged 34 years, R/o. Flat No.8, Padmini Apartment, APSEB Colony, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam City. ...Petitioner/Accused No.1 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, The High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...Respondent Petition under Section 528 of BNSS (Old Provision under Section 482 of Cr.P.C), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to relax the conditions imposed by this Hon’ble Court by its order dated 20.08.2025 in Crl.P.No.8440 of 2025 that (ii) The petitioner- accused No.1 shall appear before the Station House Officer concerned on every Saturday in between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. till cognizance is taken by the learned the Trial Court; (iii) The petitioner-accused No.1 shall not leave the limits of the district without prior permission from the investigating officer; while granting bail to the petitioner herein in connection with Crime No. 141 of 2025 of III Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionarate in the interest of justice. Pending disposal of CRLP No. 8440 of 2025, on the file of the High Court.
The petition conning on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 20.08.2025 made in CrlP.No.8440 of 2025 and upon hearing the
Arguments of Sri Ginjupalli Subba Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner/Accused and of Assistant Public Prosecutor fdr the Respondent, Court made the following
ORDER:
“Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, the I.A.No.01 of 2025 is allowed. However, the petitioner ishall make himself available to the Investigating Officer as and when Required. Accordingly, the I.A.No.01 of 2025 is allowed.
SD/-M.PRABHAKAR RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, I
1. The I Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court for NDPS at Visakhapatnam. 5
2. The IV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam.
3. The Superintendent, Visakhapatnam Sub-Jail, Visakhapatnam.
4. The S.H.O, III Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissionerate.
5. One CC to Sri Ginjupalli Subba Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT]
7. One spare copy cvss
HIGH COURT Dr.YLR,J DATED:24/10/2025
ORDER lA No. 1 OF 2025 IN CRLP NO: 8440 OF 2025 DIRECTION