Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 46198 (RAJ)

D K AGARWAL AND ANR v. RAJ STATE INDUSTRIAL DEV INVESTMENT COR

CMA/6447/2016 · 2025-11-17

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46311] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 6447/2016 1. D.K. Agarwal S/o Shri Om Prakash, A-3, Bhagirath Colony, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Presently residing at B-3, 1700, World Spa West, Gurgaon-122001 1- D.K. Agarwal S/o Shri Om Prakash, 6, Rambagh, Kanwli Road, Dehradun, U.P. 2- Shri D.K. Agarwal Dy. General Manager (Finance), Driging Business O.N.G.C. Dehradun. 2. Smt. Satya Agarwal W/o Shri D.K. Agarwal, A-3, Bhagirath Colony, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Appellants Versus 1. Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Limited (RIICO), Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 2. M/s. Om Marbles Limited, through the Managing Director/Chairman/Promoters (A) Registered Office R-7, Nehru Enclave, New Delhi- 110019 (B) Administrative Office A-3, Bhagirath Colony, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur-302001. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 17/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that during the pendency of the present appeal, as per the one-time settlement scheme of RIICO, the appellants and the respondents are willing to settle the entire dispute under the one-time settlement scheme, [2025:RJ-JP:46311] (2 of 2) [CMA-6447/2016] and the requisite proceedings have already been initiated. Therefore, prays to withdraw the present appeal at this stage. 2. In that view of the matter, the present civil misc. appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. However, it is made clear that the appellants shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the appeal, if a necessary settlement is not materialized or if the cause of action still survives, subject to applicable law. 4. The respondents are also at liberty to raise all legal pleas available to the respondents after revival of the appeal. 5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-22